Executive Summary of National Biodiversity Strategy and
Action Plan (NBSAP)
This document meets
Mauritian obligations under article 6a of the Convention
on Biological
Diversity (CBD) by setting
out a National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan (NBSAP)
that reflects and aims to meet the measures of the CBD. This
document has been divided into two parts. Part I deals with
Mauritius only and part II with Rodrigues so as to reflect
the semi-autonomous nature of Rodrigues’ governance
and the distinct biogeography of the island.
The Biodiversity Country Study is summarised and updated
in chapters 2-4 and 6 for Mauritius and Rodrigues respectively.
Biodiversity issues are addressed and reviewed under the
headings of: forest and terrestrial biodiversity; freshwater,
coastal and marine biodiversity; and agricultural biodiversity,
biotechnology and biosafety.
Habitat loss is identified as the major historical cause
of terrestrial biodiversity loss, through initial deforestation
and the latter conversion to wide scale and intensive agricultural
use. The landscape has been altered significantly with only
small and fragmented areas of primary and secondary habitat
remaining. These remaining areas are now under severe pressure
from Invasive Alien Species.
Near shore and lagoon environments have been subject to
overfishing whilst some touristic activities have impacted
significantly on the coastal zone. Freshwater ecosystems
meanwhile are very poorly understood and have been subject
to significant degradation due to deforestation, pollution
and the demand for water from agricultural activities.
Most agricultural biodiversity is introduced, though some
significant local varieties and breeds have been developed
through time. Knowledge of these local varieties is however
limited, with traits and characteristics not properly catalogued
and described. Local agrobiodiversity is in decline due to
the introduction of modern commercial varieties/breeds. Biotechnology
is well developed for a country the size of Mauritius and
there is considerable ongoing investment, it is however important
that this be properly balanced by the appropriate biosafety
provisions and notably the balanced education of the public
and their inclusion in decision-making processes.
Sadly the Republic of Mauritius is today typified by highly
degraded ecosystems, but despite this excellent conservation
initiatives have been undertaken in recent years that provide
hope for further success in the future.
The action plans for Mauritius and Rodrigues (chapters 5
and 7 respectively) set out prioritised activities, with
structured goals and targets, as determined by extensive
stakeholder consultation and input. They share common working
principles centred on in-situ conservation and ecosystem
approaches. Activities are based on the development of representative
and viable protected area networks, the control of invasive
alien species, the management of key components of biodiversity,
the enhanced identification (particularly of freshwater ecosystems)
and monitoring of biodiversity and mechanisms to enable sustainable
use through ecotourism development and sound management of
natural resources. Emphasis is also placed on the sound application
of modern biotechnology through the balanced implementation
of the provisions of the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety.
Enabling activities (such as the development of an overarching
Biodiversity Policy and a Clearing House Mechanism, the rapid
assessment of freshwater biodiversity; and a valuation of
the function and services of biodiversity) are identified
for attention during the first two years of the plan such
that prerequisite capacity needs are addressed and the foundations
laid for the balanced implementation of the broader plans
over the ensuing 10 years.
Finally, empowered stakeholder
partnership and implementation is recognised as fundamental
to the successful implementation
of the NBSAP and the mainstreaming of the conservation and
sustainable use of biodiversity. For this reason the action
plans are to be steered and coordinated by representative
and equitable stakeholder committees. The plans are intended
to be of 10 years duration (2006 –2015) and have an
inbuilt independent review mechanism to enable adaptive utilisation
of effort and resources in order to optimise attainment of
the plan’s strategic objectives.
Click
here to access full report >>
|